Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Phrasebook Shia-ism

Lucy has finally hit upon a scholarship option but she needs to prove that she is a native leader, yes very much in those “native leader” terms and I’m helping her look the most bhooka nanga (i.e. hungry naked people) out of all the bhooka nangas who will be applying. In the course of Mission: Bapu Lucy, it becomes clear that while Pakistani banks in a fantabulous display of locust mentality are showering loans for all types of cars, education expenses warrant a frosty amount of money.

Yesterday at M&M’s place I saw the video recording of that sand-weathered Shia ritual of matam, of mourning. M&M’s family are ritualistically, Shia’s by the book, the entire family gathers at the family seat in Jhelum to commemorate Ashura where they lead the whole procession from dawn till evening to their house. I was introduced to the concept of the zul juna (the horse that Husayn rode into battle) and the shibli( the likeness of his grave I think) and though I still don’t understand the significance, I saw the zanjir ka matam and somehow it didn’t look as ominous as it had always sounded, nor did it look as bloody as the mourning in Iraq. I think a lot of it was because only a fraction of the procession was lamenting by hitting themselves with chains, and that was mostly made up of the M&M clan. However, the sheer number of the people constituting the procession was overwhelming, there were guardrails demarcating the area between the procession and the Sunni observers, I guess, to ensure they did not hinder the flow. I can’t help it and I realize that being part of a discipline of study weds you to it, making you think of everything from that front, but my thoughts on the procession had more to do with “wow, what an avenue for mobilization and revolt” than the atrocious massacre that occurred at Kerbala. Mosques are pallid platforms of social gatherings compared to these processions where history is interwoven with current events to agitate emotions. The revolution overturning the Shah of Iran started from the front of a procession like this and although it sounds dangerous, the idea of people harnessing themselves to a roiling mass, the potential in this event as a collectivization front is enormous.

A minority knows of its own existence much much before the majority has an inkling of self-awareness. In grade eight I found out I was a Sunni and even if it didn't matter to me, it did matter to the Shia girl who asked me.Thankfully, my family was not the of the virulent orthodox kinds that brought children up with ludicrous myths about Shia rituals, the reason I think I wasn't aware of the distinction was because no one brought it up. A. told me the other day that when he was young, his friends used to come up and ask him if he really practiced occult witchcraft stuff (I will not mention specifics because it just reflects bad taste and a gauche paradigm) at their majlis. M&M underwent public schooling during Zia's time and he said there were times he walked into class and his name would be scrawled on the blackboard with various obscenities. Obviously at some level humanism took a real punch from parenting.Historically I'm not sure where the split comes in apart from the debate that H. Ali should have succeeded H.Muhammad in the rule of the Khilafat. However Sunni faith is comparatively more ahistorical than the Shia faith and historical sources are not a strong part of the regular teachings we undergo. Faith wise I am told, the Shia faith does not believe in predestination while the Sunni faith does. Politically it may have made sense to use predestination to justify Kerbala (Sunni front that is) but I don't see how it is tenable to regard predestination as the singular absolver of all things in this world. After all, across faiths, God "knowing" what you will do, does not in any way interfere with your decision of what to do. I mean I KNOW your hand will burn if you put it in the fire but my knowing (and keeping my mouth shut) has nothing to do with your decision to extend it into the fire or not.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

that's the kind of open mindedness you need to achieve the world's collective dream of peace. as a shia i often have to answer questions of "but why -" and allegations of "its so unislamic". and all i could think of was, how is that any of your business?

great post

on a less relevant note, i've tried and i've tried to comment on your blog for ages but somehow the pakistan government does not concur with my opinions...

Anonymous said...

and here we go. it just did :) yipee!

but why oh why don't you ditch the fishy template and move to the much better wordpress?

moizza said...

Xilleillahi: I don't know if its so much open mindedness as much as it is a utilitarian view:P I'm not gung-ho about religion. I see it more as a means to an end, specially politically. Other than that, I think it's best it stays in people's heads.

Thanks for coming by!

moizza said...

King:I've given up on the hope that one day religion can be just something internal and un-institutionalized. It seems to be some sort of mother/father figure that people need, it doesn't even have to be sold to them.What is weird is, that yes, morally very little distinction between all religions but it has been made into a civilizational divide.It's like the new communal identity even though it has less sway than ethnic identity (i.e. i hardly believe muslims from pak and saudi will ever be able to relate to each other).

Either way it becomes impossible to deny the reality that it is there, so you may as well accept that its an issue and move from there. It's muddy and depressing but its there.